How Did This Get Made?

Return to Oz

January 30, 2026

Key Takeaways Copied to clipboard!

  • The hosts found Disney's *Return to Oz* to be a surprisingly dark film, comparing it more to *Pan's Labyrinth* or *The Dark Crystal* than the original *The Wizard of Oz*. 
  • A major point of contention was the film's confusing narrative structure as a sequel, especially since Dorothy's experiences in the first film are seemingly invalidated or ignored. 
  • Despite the hosts' general discomfort and confusion over the plot and tone, audience reception (based on Letterboxd reviews cited) is overwhelmingly positive, with 80% five-star ratings. 
  • The discussion concludes with a general recommendation to watch *Return to Oz* due to its bizarre and 'gonzo nutso' practical effects, despite acknowledging it doesn't hold together as a coherent story or faithful continuation of the Oz saga. 
  • A significant amount of footage was cut from *Return to Oz*, including a final minute-and-a-half scene of Dorothy and Toto playing in a field, suggesting the film could have been much longer. 
  • There is a perceived lack of overlap between devoted fans of the original *The Wizard of Oz* and fans of *Return to Oz*, with the latter potentially being more appreciated by those familiar with L. Frank Baum's original books. 

Segments

Initial Reactions and Context Setting
Copied to clipboard!
(00:01:59)
  • Key Takeaway: The hosts immediately express feeling ’traumatized’ by Return to Oz, which is identified as a big-budget 1985 Disney film.
  • Summary: Paul Scheer introduces the film, noting its IMDb logline about Dorothy being saved from psychiatric experiments and returning to Oz. June Diane Reayfield and Jason Manzukis confirm they are both traumatized by the viewing experience. The discussion briefly touches upon the visual similarity between Tik-Tok the robot and the Monopoly Man.
Oz’s Reality and Visual Tone
Copied to clipboard!
(00:06:36)
  • Key Takeaway: Unlike The Wizard of Oz, the events in Return to Oz are not a dream, and the film opens with desaturated, bleak cinematography reminiscent of The Grapes of Wrath.
  • Summary: The hosts note that Oz is real in this sequel, contrasting sharply with the original film’s dream structure. The visual style is described as fully desaturated, giving it a ‘Dust Bowl-era’ look. This bleakness leads the hosts to question why Disney chose this direction for a sequel to a joyful property.
Dorothy’s Characterization and Journey
Copied to clipboard!
(00:08:18)
  • Key Takeaway: Dorothy in Return to Oz feels significantly older and more passive than Judy Garland’s counterpart, lacking the clear emotional connective tissue of the original journey.
  • Summary: The hosts find Dorothy’s journey confounding, noting she seems reactive rather than driving the plot forward. They struggle to track who wants what, feeling the film functions more like a prequel or a memory of the first film rather than a true sequel. The lack of an explicit ’last time on’ recap for the audience is noted as a flaw.
Disturbing Imagery and Director’s Craft
Copied to clipboard!
(00:11:27)
  • Key Takeaway: The film’s director, legendary editor Walter Murch, drew inspiration from the historical non-fiction book Wisconsin Death Trip, contributing to the movie’s dark craft.
  • Summary: Paul highlights the disturbing moment where the doctor personifies the electroshock machine, describing its ’eyes’ and ’tongue’ to Dorothy. The hosts acknowledge the film’s craft, noting Walter Murch’s editing pedigree, and the visual effectiveness of elements like the Hallway of Heads.
Jack Pumpkinhead and Character Downgrades
Copied to clipboard!
(00:17:53)
  • Key Takeaway: The introduction of Jack Pumpkinhead calling Dorothy ‘Mom’ was highly distressing, and the talking chicken, Billina, is considered a significant downgrade from Toto.
  • Summary: The hosts express discomfort over Jack Pumpkinhead’s maternal address toward Dorothy, noting Tim Burton admitted using this character for inspiration for Jack Skellington. The talking chicken, Billina, is universally panned as a downgrade from Toto, especially since Toto did not talk in the original film.
Faruza Balk’s Performance Constraints
Copied to clipboard!
(00:23:44)
  • Key Takeaway: Faruza Balk, who plays Dorothy, was legally restricted to working only three and a half hours per day, complicating production since she was in nearly every scene.
  • Summary: The hosts note that Balk’s limited work hours, which included breaks and education, must have severely impacted the shooting schedule, especially since there were few adult scenes to cover when she left. This constraint is contrasted with the original film’s buoyant performance by Judy Garland.
The Gnome King’s Death by Egg
Copied to clipboard!
(00:45:25)
  • Key Takeaway: The Gnome King is killed when the chicken, Billina, lays an egg down his throat, which Jason Manzukis interprets as a cathartic moment related to his childhood allergy bracelet.
  • Summary: The hosts focus on the bizarre climax where the chicken’s egg proves fatal to the chicken-hating Gnome King. Jason relates this moment to his own childhood experience of wearing a medical alert bracelet for an egg allergy, suggesting the scene provided a form of catharsis.
Audience Reception and Final Thoughts
Copied to clipboard!
(00:59:17)
  • Key Takeaway: Despite the hosts’ critical reservations about the plot’s aimlessness, audience reviews show that 80% of Letterboxd users rated Return to Oz five stars, often citing it as a beloved, albeit disturbing, childhood film.
  • Summary: The hosts are surprised by the high audience approval rating of 80% five-star reviews on Letterboxd. One review explicitly recommends parents show the film to their children, even if it causes nightmares. The segment concludes with the hosts acknowledging that the film’s dark nature might appeal to a specific generation.
Review Interpretation and Insanity
Copied to clipboard!
(01:02:34)
  • Key Takeaway: A five-star review framed the film as a statement on social alienation where creativity appears tantamount to insanity.
  • Summary: A review read during the segment suggested the film comments on modern commodification and social alienation, equating piercing through it with insanity. The hosts questioned this interpretation, noting Dorothy returns to the farm, implying a lack of lasting creative change. The difficulty of escaping farm life in 1930s Kansas was highlighted as an insurmountable gravitational pull.
Cut Scene and Final Verdict
Copied to clipboard!
(01:03:12)
  • Key Takeaway: A cut scene showed Dorothy and Toto playing happily in a field, contrasting with the film’s dark tone.
  • Summary: The final cut scene of the film featured Dorothy and Toto playing in a field for a minute and a half. Despite the film’s length and oddity, the hosts ultimately recommended watching Return to Oz because it is so weird and contains ‘gonzo nutso stuff.’ The film’s editor was noted for being willing to cut out many scenes, suggesting the original cut was significantly longer.
Practical Effects Appreciation
Copied to clipboard!
(01:04:33)
  • Key Takeaway: The 1985 film utilized practical elements like puppets for its fantastical characters, offering cool visuals.
  • Summary: The practical nature of the fantastical elements in Return to Oz, such as the pumpkin guy and Tik-Tok, was appreciated as cool visual components from that era. While the story and logic of the movie do not hold together, it avoids being boring due to these visual aspects. The hosts suggested enjoyment increases if the viewer sets aside expectations based on the original The Wizard of Oz.
Audience Divide and Availability
Copied to clipboard!
(01:05:29)
  • Key Takeaway: Fans of the original Wizard of Oz likely do not overlap with fans of Return to Oz, which was more accessible on cable/Disney Channel for a generation.
  • Summary: It is suggested that people who deeply love the original The Wizard of Oz movie may not enjoy Return to Oz because the sequel is not faithful to the original film’s spirit. Conversely, fans of the original Oz books might be more accepting of the sequel’s deviations. This film was constantly available on cable or the Disney Channel for many children, potentially leading to wider recognition than the older 1939 classic.
Host Promotions and Wrap Up
Copied to clipboard!
(01:07:35)
  • Key Takeaway: Jason promoted his Broadway show All Out and June mentioned her ongoing work on Percy Jackson season two.
  • Summary: Jason promoted his appearance in the Broadway show All Out at the Niederlander Theater, urging New York area listeners to get tickets. Paul promoted a 15-minute mini-documentary he released about Taylor Swift dads, clarifying it is not about Taylor Swift’s father. The hosts concluded by asking listeners to rate, review, and follow the podcast for automatic downloads.