Why the US chose not to have a passenger train system like Europe

Key Takeaways Copied to clipboard!

• The US has prioritized and developed the world's best freight railroad system, a choice driven by the country's vast geography and lower population density compared to Europe, which prioritized passenger transport.  Copied to clipboard!
• The inherent conflict between maximizing profit for private freight railroads and running frequent passenger trains (like those in Europe) significantly hinders the expansion of US passenger rail, as increased passenger service drastically cuts freight capacity.  Copied to clipboard!
• Successful US passenger rail is currently limited to dense corridors, such as the Northeast Corridor, and new projects like high-speed rail face massive cost overruns and political hurdles, suggesting that a comprehensive national system requires significant taxpayer subsidy, similar to European models.  Copied to clipboard!

Segments Expand All Collapse All

US Passenger Rail Question

Copied to clipboard!

(00:00:12)

• Key Takeaway: The central question of the episode is why the US lacks extensive passenger train systems compared to Europe, Japan, and India.
• Summary: The episode opens by referencing the sound of a new Amtrak line between New Orleans and Mobile, Alabama. This prompts the core inquiry: why the US does not mirror the extensive passenger train networks found in Europe and other nations. The show promises to explain the historical choice behind this difference and highlight areas where US railroads still excel.

Freight vs. Passenger Focus

Copied to clipboard!

(00:03:01)

• Key Takeaway: The US has deliberately emphasized freight transportation, resulting in the world’s best freight railroad system, while Europe prioritized passenger transport.
• Summary: The US possesses more railroad tracks than any other country, but these are almost exclusively dedicated to moving goods. This divergence in focus—freight in the US versus passenger service in Europe—is identified as a fundamental underlying choice. The vast, spread-out geography of the US makes long-distance passenger rail inherently time-consuming compared to air travel.

Profitability and Stockholders

Copied to clipboard!

(00:04:33)

• Key Takeaway: US freight railroads are extremely profitable, influencing private owners’ reluctance to share tracks with less profitable passenger services.
• Summary: Freight railroads are highly profitable, exemplified by major investments like Warren Buffett’s acquisition of Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Railroad owners argue their duty is to maximize profit for stockholders, meaning they resist passenger trains that reduce freight capacity. This creates a conflict between private profit maximization and potential societal benefits derived from passenger service.

Track Sharing Conflict

Copied to clipboard!

(00:05:17)

• Key Takeaway: Sharing existing tracks becomes infeasible when passenger service frequency increases from occasional to near-hourly, potentially halving freight capacity.
• Summary: While sharing tracks for one or two Amtrak trains daily is manageable, running a true European-style system (trains every half hour) would require 20 to 30 passenger trains daily. This level of frequency would necessitate cutting the freight capacity by half, which freight owners strongly oppose. The restoration of the New Orleans to Mobile line took two decades due to negotiations over this track usage conflict.

Building New Corridors

Copied to clipboard!

(00:07:27)

• Key Takeaway: Building dedicated new high-speed rail lines, like California’s project, is extremely expensive and often faces significant political and logistical delays.
• Summary: Building separate tracks for passenger trains is an alternative, but the California high-speed rail project illustrates the challenges. This project, intended to connect San Francisco and LA, has been bogged down by political disputes over routing. Furthermore, the estimated cost has ballooned to nearly four times the original 2008 forecast.

Corridor Approach Success

Copied to clipboard!

(00:08:58)

• Key Takeaway: The most successful US passenger rail model is the Northeast Corridor, demonstrating viability where cities are close and service is frequent.
• Summary: The ‘corridor approach’ involves focusing on stretches connecting a few large, relatively close metros. The Northeast Corridor (Washington to Boston) is highly successful, with the majority of travelers between those cities choosing the train. Private operator Brightline is currently building a corridor between Las Vegas and Southern California, though passenger rail generally requires taxpayer support to be financially viable.