Medea

Key Takeaways Copied to clipboard!

• Medea's story has been continuously retold and reinterpreted across Greek and Roman antiquity, dating back to Homer and Hesiod, with Euripides' tragedy serving as a pivotal, enduring reference point.  Copied to clipboard!
• Medea is consistently portrayed as a powerful, non-Greek 'barbarian' figure whose foreign values clash with the Greek center, a common theme in Greek tragedy used to explore cultural differences.  Copied to clipboard!
• Euripides' portrayal of Medea and Jason highlights their intellectual chemistry and rhetorical skill, making them a compelling, albeit toxic, match, contrasting with other tragic pairings where the characters seem mismatched.  Copied to clipboard!

Segments Expand All Collapse All

Medea’s Ancient Story Retellings

Copied to clipboard!

(00:03:35)

• Key Takeaway: Medea’s story was frequently retold in antiquity, with Hesiod first naming her and Pindar providing an early narrative version centuries before Euripides.
• Summary: The story of Medea and the Argo dates back to the earliest Greek literature, with Hesiod naming Medea in the Theogony around the late 8th or early 7th century BCE. Pindar’s fourth Pythian Ode (462/461 BCE) offers the first narrative version, focusing on her role in the foundation of Cyrene. Euripides’ tragedy, performed in 431 BCE, became so influential that subsequent versions, including Apollonius of Rhodes’ Argonautica, were written in dialogue with it.

Contrasting Medea Portrayals

Copied to clipboard!

(00:08:34)

• Key Takeaway: Medea shifts dramatically between sources, appearing as a powerful, impressionable teenager in Apollonius’ work and an utterly powerless, devastated figure in Euripides’ tragedy.
• Summary: In Apollonius of Rhodes’ Argonautica, Medea is depicted as a young, powerful priestess and witch who falls hard for Jason, requiring erotic magic to override her family loyalty. Conversely, in Euripides’ play, set years later with children present, she is initially shown as profoundly powerless and despairing before regaining composure, forcing writers to reconcile her development over time.

Medea’s Colchian Origins

Copied to clipboard!

(00:12:16)

• Key Takeaway: Medea originates from Colchis, located near modern-day Georgia on the eastern edge of the Black Sea, and was considered a ‘barbarian’ by the Greeks.
• Summary: Colchis, sometimes called Aeia, is situated near the Phasis River, corresponding to modern-day Georgia, a region that claims Medea proudly. Her father was Aetes, making her the sibling of Circe, and they were both children of the sun god Helios. For Athenian audiences, her foreign origin was crucial, as she brought non-Greek values to the center of Greece, embodying the Greek concept of the ‘invented barbarian’.

Betrayal and Brother’s Fate

Copied to clipboard!

(00:20:49)

• Key Takeaway: The act of betraying her family to help Jason involved overcoming her natural loyalty, which escalated in some versions to the dismemberment of her brother, Apsertis, to delay her father’s pursuit.
• Summary: In later versions, Medea kills and dismembers her younger brother, Apsertis, scattering the pieces so her father, Aetes, would be delayed in chasing them. However, Apollonius of Rhodes’ version features Jason killing the older brother, Apsertis, in a cowardly act, followed by Jason spitting out the blood to prevent the ghost from pursuing him. Following this, the Argonauts required purification from Medea’s aunt, Circe.

Corinth and Athenian Coincidence

Copied to clipboard!

(00:24:05)

• Key Takeaway: Euripides’ play is centered on Corinth, but the crucial plot point of securing an escape route relies on the coincidental arrival of Aegeus, the mythical king of Athens.
• Summary: Euripides’ tragedy unfolds over a single day in Corinth, where Medea faces the crisis of losing her husband and being exiled with her children. Her practical need for an escape route is resolved when Aegeus of Athens coincidentally appears and offers her safe haven in Athens. This inclusion of Athens was likely strategic, as Euripides was writing and performing the play for an Athenian audience at the Dionysia festival in 431 BCE.

Jason and Medea Chemistry

Copied to clipboard!

(00:27:35)

• Key Takeaway: Jason and Medea were a good match because both were highly intelligent and skilled rhetoricians, evidenced by their rapid, witty exchanges (stickomythia) in the play.
• Summary: Unlike Agamemnon and Clytemnestra, Jason and Medea understood each other, both being clever and adept at rhetoric, which Euripides showcases through their increasingly short, sharp lines of dialogue (stickomythia). This intense chemistry, comparable to screwball comedy pairings, suggests a powerful initial connection, even as Jason’s defense of his actions is plausible yet toxic. The chorus acknowledges Jason’s fluent arguments, though they still deem his actions morally wrong.

Medea’s Two Great Monologues

Copied to clipboard!

(00:33:01)

• Key Takeaway: Medea’s first monologue details the plight of fifth-century Athenian women under patriarchy, while her second showcases her agonizing deliberation over killing her children.
• Summary: The first monologue details the disadvantages of being a woman in a patriarchal society—the inability to vet a husband, the need for male protection, and powerlessness if repudiated—a speech Euripides wrote despite his audience likely being exclusively male. The second, deliberative monologue displays Medea’s internal war, changing her mind multiple times about infanticide to avoid the ultimate shame of being laughed at, aligning her with the moral extremism of heroes like Ajax.

The Shocking Divine Ending

Copied to clipboard!

(00:44:43)

• Key Takeaway: In Euripides’ version, Medea achieves an apotheosis by killing her children, as the gods reward her with a chariot escape while leaving Jason broken on the ground.
• Summary: Medea’s final appearance in a chariot belonging to her grandfather, Helios, utilizes the ‘Deus ex machina’ staging convention, signifying her elevation to a near-divine status. This ending implies that the gods, in the context of the play, do not disagree with her actions, as she is rewarded while Jason, who broke oaths, is abandoned. This contrasts with earlier versions where Hera might have been blamed for the children’s deaths.

Roman Reception of Medea

Copied to clipboard!

(00:48:05)

• Key Takeaway: Roman audiences likely viewed Medea differently than Athenians because Roman women held more visible roles in property ownership and imperial politics, though foreign influence remained a suspicion.
• Summary: Roman women had greater legal rights, such as owning property and influencing politics, suggesting a less cloistered existence than their Athenian counterparts. Ovid’s Heroidas, featuring Medea’s letter to Jason, shows a Roman capacity to explore female perspectives through literary ventriloquism. However, the Romans still harbored suspicion toward powerful foreign women, exemplified by anxieties surrounding figures like Dido and Cleopatra.